Why
Information Technology Sales Fail to Close
By
Gary Walker, Co-founder and managing partner, CustomerCentric
Systems, LLC
Picture this: It's the middle of the month and you are
sitting at your desk reviewing the preliminary monthly sales
forecasts submitted to you by your sales representatives.
You note for about the eighth month in a row, you see the
same prospect you've seen lingering, month after month, again,
forecast to close. This is the same prospect you authorized
the multiple "four-legged" sales calls, prototyped the "must
have, or we won't buy" reports and hosted a full day visit
at your corporate headquarters. Your company has put a lot
of time and expense into selling this account. You are under
increasing pressure to close this sale. Having considered
all these things, you decide to place a telephone call to
your sales representative to determine what else needs to
be done in order to insure that this prospect closes this
month…as forecast. Upon reaching your sales rep he informs
you that he has just spoken with the prospect and they have
decided to do business as usual; they have simply elected
to do nothing. He tells you that he has been encouraged to
follow-up in about three months. The opportunity has been
lost to 'No Decision'.
Have you experienced this lately? If you have, you are not
alone. One of the chief concerns we are hearing from the senior
sales executives with whom we have worked is their frustration
with the large number of qualified sales opportunities that
are lost to 'No Decision' after long and expensive sales cycles.
Our research shows that between 60 and 80 percent of all losses
are due to 'No Decision.' That's more losses to 'No Decision'
than to any single named competitor, making your number one
competitor…No Decision, Inc.!!
Why do your prospects elect to do nothing, despite you and
your sales representatives best efforts? We see primarily
four major reasons.
1. No Goal
CustomerCentric Selling® is helping the buyer achieve a
goal, solve a problem, or satisfy a need. It should go
without saying that if a buyer is unwilling to share a goal
with a sales person (much less a problem) then the seller
doesn't have a prospect. It is as simple as that. When we
help our clients define their sales process, an opportunity
typically goes from "Inactive" to "Active" status when the
buyer shares a goal. We use to define a prospect as
a buyer who had admitted a problem or "pain". Over the years
we discovered there were very few sellers (particularly young
sellers) who are able to get a C level executive of a public
company to publicly admit a problem. As my partner Mike Bosworth
likes to point out: As we approach middle-age, it is much
easier for us to 'volunteer' that we'd like to lose a few
pounds (a goal), than to get us to admit that we're
fat (a pain). Think about it.
Business executives don't authorize the spending of large
sums of money just to be the proud owners of whatever it is
you are selling. As a result, we subscribe to a core concept,
"No goal, no prospect." At the very minimum, the buyer must
be unhappy with some aspect of his business, and want to fix
it, to engage and initiate a "buy cycle" with a sales person.
TIP: Sales people who fail to take the time to diagnose
and understand their buyer's goal, and the business issues/obstacles
that are preventing them from achieving that goal, either
lose the sale to no decision or, get outsold by the sales
person who does.
2. No Solution
Despite your best efforts (the four-legged sales calls, the
"must have, or we won't buy" reports, corporate visits, etc.),
the buyer still does not have a clear understanding of how
he will achieve his goal(s) by purchasing your product
or service. Again, this is a result of the sales person leading
with product feature and function, before first taking the
time to understand the goal that the prospect wants to achieve,
then diagnosing and understanding the business issues and
obstacles, and then relating how the capabilities of
the product or service can be used to eliminate the prospects
business issues/obstacles allowing them to attain their goal.
TIP: The key to selling is the ability to converse.
If your salespeople are unable to have a meaningful conversation,
an intelligent two way dialogue, with a targeted decision
maker about the use of your offering to achieve a goal, solve
a problem or satisfy a need, and document that conversation
succinctly, then all the training on prospecting, qualifying,
presentation skills, closing, handling objections, negotiating,
etc., are a waste of money! The conversation is where the
sale takes place.
3. No Power
How many times have you spent months selling to someone who
told you early on that the decision to purchase your offering
was their decision, only to find out later they couldn't purchase
ten sharp pencils without someone else's approval? While end-users
and recommenders are fun to sell to, their needs and requirements
may be altogether different than the ultimate decision maker,
the person with the power and authority to buy. If
they don't have the authority to purchase your products and
services, you're not selling; you're simply providing this
person with a free (but expensive for you) education.
TIP: Senior executives are charged with identifying
and solving problems. Gaining access to the decision maker(s)
early in the sales cycle can help eliminate the risk of no
decision, protect your expensive corporate resources, cause
unbudgeted money to be spent, and dramatically shorten the
sales cycle.
4. No Value
We've already established that for a company to change how
they are currently doing business there has to be a goal.
Remember, "No goal, no prospect." The goal has
to be related back to dollars - reduced cost, avoided cost
or increased revenue, among other factors. If you are asking
a company to pay $100,000 for your product, the value of achieving
the goal(s) better be at least $200,000. It makes sense, doesn't
it? Would your spend $100,000 to solve a $50,000 problem?
I'm amazed at the number of sales people who don't take the
time to understand the value of their products and
services to their prospects and, more importantly, don't actively
participate in helping their prospect prepare a cost/benefit
analysis. Your prospect is not the only one who is competing
for his/her company's potentially limited funding. You need
to equip him with the logic and rationale to support his request
for funding.
TIP: Think of the tactical advantage a sales person
has going into price negotiations when he knows exactly how
much his prospect will save and when he will achieve a return
on his investment. It makes it very easy to say 'No', in response
to a request for a discount.
Now, let me ask you a question. Think of all of your 'year-to-date'
missed opportunities. What would it have been worth to you
and your organization if your sales people could have reduced
their losses to 'No Decision' by twenty, fifty, or even seventy-five
percent? Isn't it time to enroll in a CustomerCentric Selling®
workshop?
Gary Walker is managing partner of CustomerCentric
Systems, LLC and coauthor of the CustomerCentric Selling®
sales methodology. He can be reached at gwalker@customercentricsystems.com.
|